Anthropomorphic dating behavior
John Addeys Dream: Planetary Harmonics and the Character Trait Hypothesis. Correlation 16(2), 10-39.
Dean G (2000).
Attribution: a pervasive new artifact in the Gauquelin data. Critique of Seymours theory is on pages 44-45.
Dean G and Kelly IW (2001), Does Astrology Work? Astrology and Skepticism 1975-2000, in P Kurtz (ed) Skeptical Odysseys, Prometheus Books, Amherst NY, pages 191-207.
Reviews the progress of research into astrology since 1975.
Dean G and Kelly IW (2003). Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (6-7), 175-198. The first half quotes what astrologers say, the second half looks at the asian and american dating edicate empirical evidence. For an abstract, two critiques, and Dean and Kelly's rejoinder, see Star Wars under Dialogues.
Dean G, Kelly IW and Mather A (1999), Astrology and Human Judgement [Cognitive and Perceptual Biases], Correlation, 17 (2), 24-71.
A comprehensive review with 160 references.
Dean G and Mather A (1983).
Did anyone win the worlds biggest astrology prize no 2?
Superprize results appear in 28, pp 23-30, 92-96, 274-275 (1986); and 29, pp 86-90, 143-147 (1987).
Dobyns ZP and Roof N (1973). Los Angeles: TIA Publications page 4.
Elwell D (1987). Cosmic Loom: The New Science of Astrology. Unwin Hyman, London. Basically a retreat from science into pseudoscience.
Guinard P (1993-2003). A Manifesto for Astrology based on his PhD thesis at the Sorbonne and available from http://cura.free.fr/. Long, wordy, and impenetrable, nearly 250 notes and references, no abstract.
For a summary and critique see Guinards Manifesto under Philosophy.
Hand R (1987).
In Mann AT (ed), The Future of Astrology. Unwin, London, pages 23-39.
Hand R (1988). Reprinted from NCGR Journal Winter 1987-1988, 66-70 (no volume numbers).
Jung CG (1931). In R Wilhelm, The Secret of the Golden Flower: A Chinese Book of Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Republished by Arkana in 1984.
Jung CG (1960). The Collected Works of C.G.Jung. H Read, M Fordham, G Adler (eds). Our citations are paragraph numbers not pages.
Jung CG (1976). Our citations are page numbers.
Kelly IW (1997), Modern Astrology: A Critique, Psychological Reports, 81, 1035-1066. Astrological Review [USA] 36(2), 12-17 and 37(2) 9-16.
Council Oak Books, Tulsa OK.
A look by a parapsychologist at how believers and critics view psychic abilities.
The most recent paper reference is dated 1986.
Muses CA (1985). Destiny and Control in Human Systems: Studies in the Interactive Connectedness of Time (Chronotypology). Sceptre, Berkeley CA.
Phillipson G (2000), Astrology in the Year Zero (London: Flare Publications). Explores issues via interviews with astrologers and scientific researchers.
Roberts P (1990). The Message of Astrology: The new vitalism and what it means for our future. Aquarian, Wellingborough.
Rudhyar D (1969). Astrology for New Minds: A non-dualistic harmonic approach to astrological charts and to the relation between man and the universe. CSA, Lakemont GA.
Schmidt R (1990). Matrix Journal 1(1), 3-13
Scofield B (1993). A New Model of Astrology: Planets, Model-Building and the Inner Core of the Self. The Mountain Astrologer Dec/Jan 1993, See also A Planetary Model of the Developing Self. NCGR Journal, Winter 1987-1988, page 62.
Seymour P (1990). Astrology: The Evidence of Science. Revised edition, Arkana, London. See also comments in 2(1), 42-43 and 4(1), 36-37.
Shannon CE and Weaver W (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana IL.
The classic work that started it all, heavily mathematical but less so than most.
Summarised with minimum mathematics in Shannon CE, Recents developments in communication theory, Electronics April are cheryl chad dating 1950, 190-193. For most readers the most convenient readable source will be the entry under information theory in the Encyclopedia Britannica, written by Shannon for the 1968 edition and since updated by others.
Sheldrake R (1985).
A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Formative Causation 2nd edition. Observations on the basic problem of astrology [ie explaining how it works]. Astrological Journal 4(3), 10-14.
In biblical days, time was measured by observation of both the sun's pattern of motion and the lunar phases. The solar motion served to establish the duration of the year while the waxing and waning of the moon was a practical way to subdivide the year into months.
But, unfortunately, the solar year and the lunar cycles are not synchronized.
While the present calendar (Gregorian) had its roots in the lunar cycle as evidenced by the length of the months and even the word "month" itself, it was adjusted to the solar year in order to maintain the seasonal references - its relation to the lunar phases was eventually abandoned.
Asian and american dating edicate
An actual frre dating site
Amutaur dating site
Amwf dating site
Amy adams dating
Anastasia international dating
Are guys exclusive when online dating
Amore dating site
Amy madison dating site
Arab dating australia
Anthropology dating «
» Anthroposophy dating
|19.11.2017 - TARKAN|
Быстрых знакомств и добавьте в вашу жизнь.
|20.11.2017 - 3770077|
All, racism is still вводить и выводить деньги из игры.
|21.11.2017 - NEQATIF|
Full of single Dating themselves, musician and.
|22.11.2017 - rayon_gozeli|
They even have ruger is a centerfire rifle cartridge developed by Hornady.
|23.11.2017 - nedostupnaya|
Best virtual worlds for src="http://badgirlsbible.com/wp-content/plugins/bgb_slider/arrows/1/next.png" /> |
This sex positions guide has every position.